CD-R Evaluations - Archive

Various discs were tested using a Clover CD Analyzer, prior to 2002. For the most recent results, click here.
The tests are not intended to be comprehensive, but cover only
Block Error Rates.

Members, may see more detailed results.

Disclaimer

RESULTS ON TEAC 58-S at 6x (lower is better)

Peak BLER
Average BLER
E22
E32

TDK (Taiwan) 74

10
0.8
0
0

Kodak Silver 74

12
1.0
0
0

Sony Thermal 74

16
0.6
0
0

That's CD-R 80

16
1.8
0
0

Mitsui Gold 74

22
1.3
0
0

Laser Diamond-Coat 80

23
1.3
0
0

TDK (Japan) 74

23
2
0
0

Kodak Gold 74

25
2.7
0
0

Verbatim Generic 74

28
1.2
0
0

Glyphics Silver/Green 74

29
1.3
0
0

Glyphics Silver/Green 80

30
1.4
96
0

Verbatim Branded 74

30
1.8
0
0

Laser Glossy Thermal 80

31
5.4
21
0

Princo 74

33
6.7
0
0

Laser Glossy Thermal 74

37
6.9
6
0

Princo 80

42
5.7
0
0

Glyphics Silver/Silver "Diamond" 74

44
2.7
4
0

DigiMedia 80 Black

112
7.3
36
0

Capax Silver/Silver "Diamond" 80

489
147.7
34
0

Ritek Thermal 74 Silver/Blue

583
96.9
0
0

Disclaimer

These recordable discs have been tested as a free service for members of the IDDA as a guide only, and the IDDA and any organizations that have assisted with the tests accept no responsibility for the accuracy of these evaluations and the use of the data.

Whilst care has been taken with these evaluations, they are to be considered a rough guide only. Many factors can affect the results, such as the testing equipment, the recorder used, recording speed, ambient conditions, and even wear and condition of the stamper used to make the disc. Disc brands and qualities will also vary between states and countries, and from batch to batch.

The IDDA has at this stage tested only for BLER (Block Error Rates), as we believe that for recordable discs this is the most useful test of the recordability and playability of the discs. If the discs are good, then we have enough information. If the discs are bad, then there is a variety of other tests that are required to determine why the disc is bad, such as tests for eccentricity, reflectivity, jitter, to name a few. These other tests are not covered here.

The manufacturer stated is based on results obtained using "CDR Identifier" software, and it is acknowledged that at best, this is an indicator of the manufacturer of the stamper used to create the discs, not necessarily the actual manufacturer. Members may download a copy of "CDR Identifier" (212 kb). You may also view the "ReadMe" text file that came with the program.

The IDDA invites members, users and manufacturers to contribute and submit their own tests, and to send the results of any tests by any testing equipment along with two clean, unused discs in standard jewel cases for verification to

International Disc Duplicating Association,
Shop 8.06,
100 Miller Street
North Sydney NSW 2060
Australia

List

 

 

 

Home | Members List | Press Releases | Definitions | Licensing | Discussion | User Reports | Disc Tests | Logos | Aims | Constitution

 

Click Here!

This page last updated July 24, 2002.